<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Christopher Leger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://christopherleger.com/wordpress/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://christopherleger.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>Intellectual Property, Individual Rights, and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:21:20 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time for copyright reform? by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://christopherleger.com/wordpress/2008/03/03/time-for-copyright-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christopherleger.com/wordpress/2008/03/03/time-for-copyright-reform/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Great start!!!
Compulsory licenses for all uses set from day one, with fees to content owners based on a &quot;percentage of income the use generates&quot; since the markeplace determines the value. This could even include fair use since it offers incentive for expanding copyright to the benefit of everyone from new and expanding uses and &quot;promotes the progress of science and useful art&quot; for the end user as wel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great start!!!<br />
Compulsory licenses for all uses set from day one, with fees to content owners based on a &#8220;percentage of income the use generates&#8221; since the markeplace determines the value. This could even include fair use since it offers incentive for expanding copyright to the benefit of everyone from new and expanding uses and &#8220;promotes the progress of science and useful art&#8221; for the end user as wel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time for copyright reform? by Randal L. Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://christopherleger.com/wordpress/2008/03/03/time-for-copyright-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Randal L. Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 04:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christopherleger.com/wordpress/2008/03/03/time-for-copyright-reform/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I agree.  120 years is far too long.

Oddly enough, Disney wouldn&#039;t have the works of the Brothers Grimm if the brothers had taken the same attitude toward locking their work in perpetuity that Disney has taken to &quot;protecting the mouse&quot;.  And then where would Disney be, without Snow White and most of the other traditional tales?

I also support an even shorter term, in this modern age.  I would argue that 7 years is plenty.  If you can&#039;t make an ROI for an information product or an act of creativity in 7 years, you&#039;re playing &quot;starving artist&quot; and not &quot;commercial artist&quot;, and probably wouldn&#039;t have made any money in the next 7 years either.

But here&#039;s where I&#039;ll disagree with you.   No fees to extend it.  Just forbid extending it.  The moment you introduce a fee system, *someone* will find a creative accounting scheme to show that there was no money made by an item, or so little that it would be trivial to &quot;renew&quot; for a much longer time.

Seven years is plenty.  Then public domain.  For everything.  If it&#039;s a play, the original performers will still be sought after as having the most experience.  If it&#039;s a book, enough people will have read it by then.

As a transition, 14 years would also seem to work ok.  But eventually, it should become seven years from date of first publication.  Period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  120 years is far too long.</p>
<p>Oddly enough, Disney wouldn&#8217;t have the works of the Brothers Grimm if the brothers had taken the same attitude toward locking their work in perpetuity that Disney has taken to &#8220;protecting the mouse&#8221;.  And then where would Disney be, without Snow White and most of the other traditional tales?</p>
<p>I also support an even shorter term, in this modern age.  I would argue that 7 years is plenty.  If you can&#8217;t make an ROI for an information product or an act of creativity in 7 years, you&#8217;re playing &#8220;starving artist&#8221; and not &#8220;commercial artist&#8221;, and probably wouldn&#8217;t have made any money in the next 7 years either.</p>
<p>But here&#8217;s where I&#8217;ll disagree with you.   No fees to extend it.  Just forbid extending it.  The moment you introduce a fee system, *someone* will find a creative accounting scheme to show that there was no money made by an item, or so little that it would be trivial to &#8220;renew&#8221; for a much longer time.</p>
<p>Seven years is plenty.  Then public domain.  For everything.  If it&#8217;s a play, the original performers will still be sought after as having the most experience.  If it&#8217;s a book, enough people will have read it by then.</p>
<p>As a transition, 14 years would also seem to work ok.  But eventually, it should become seven years from date of first publication.  Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on is this the future of small networks? by Christopher Leger</title>
		<link>http://christopherleger.com/wordpress/2008/01/07/is-this-the-future-of-small-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Leger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christopherleger.com/wordpress/2008/01/07/is-this-the-future-of-small-networks/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>The man, the myth, the legend! I&#039;m honored you read my post Marc! I also plan on writing a post about the podcast you did about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twit.tv/fib21&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DCA&lt;/a&gt; at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.depmed.ualberta.ca/dca/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;University of Alberta with Dr. Evangelos Michelakis&lt;/a&gt;. I honestly think that was the podcast of the year, and should be required listening for virtually everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The man, the myth, the legend! I&#8217;m honored you read my post Marc! I also plan on writing a post about the podcast you did about <a href="http://www.twit.tv/fib21" rel="nofollow">DCA</a> at the <a href="http://www.depmed.ualberta.ca/dca/" rel="nofollow">University of Alberta with Dr. Evangelos Michelakis</a>. I honestly think that was the podcast of the year, and should be required listening for virtually everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on is this the future of small networks? by Marc Pelletier</title>
		<link>http://christopherleger.com/wordpress/2008/01/07/is-this-the-future-of-small-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Pelletier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christopherleger.com/wordpress/2008/01/07/is-this-the-future-of-small-networks/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Apple&#039;s Xgrid does a pretty decent job.. 

http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/technology/xgrid.html

folding at home is definitely a great proof of concept for distributed computing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple&#8217;s Xgrid does a pretty decent job.. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/technology/xgrid.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/technology/xgrid.html</a></p>
<p>folding at home is definitely a great proof of concept for distributed computing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on is this the future of small networks? by ML</title>
		<link>http://christopherleger.com/wordpress/2008/01/07/is-this-the-future-of-small-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>ML</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christopherleger.com/wordpress/2008/01/07/is-this-the-future-of-small-networks/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Hasn&#039;t this networking technology been out there for a long time?  Isn&#039;t this how they worked on the Human Genome project?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hasn&#8217;t this networking technology been out there for a long time?  Isn&#8217;t this how they worked on the Human Genome project?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.344 seconds -->

